studentname = ""; $this->password = ""; $this->player = ""; $this->speed = ""; $this->mspeed = ""; } } function getStudentID($username, $pass) { $myDB = new mysqlDB; $myDB->Connect("trvuniversity"); $myDB->Query("SELECT studentID FROM login WHERE username = '$username' AND password = '$pass'"); $row = $myDB->GetRow(); return $row["studentID"]; } } class TRVU_Assignment { var $status; var $hits; var $attempts; } $userdata = unserialize(urldecode($_COOKIE["trvudata"])); if ($userdata->studentname == "") {$error = "You are not authorized to view this page (TRV 101). "; include("/usr/sites/www.trvuniversity.com/error.html"); exit(0);} $myDB = new mysqlDB; $myDB->Connect("trvuniversity"); $studentID = getStudentID($userdata->studentname, $userdata->password); //1. are they enrolled in this course, and are they ok to view it? $myDB->Query("SELECT status, cstatus, UNIX_TIMESTAMP(enrolldate) AS enrolldate, UNIX_TIMESTAMP(expirydate) AS expirydate, UNIX_TIMESTAMP(completed) AS completed FROM training WHERE studentID = $studentID AND courseID = 1"); $row = $myDB->GetRow(); switch ($row["status"]) { case 0: switch ($row["cstatus"]) { case 0: break; //OK case 1: break; //course completed case 2: $error = "You are not authorized to view this page (TRV 101). Error: Course Dropped"; break; case 3: $error = "You are not authorized to view this page (TRV 101). Error: Unknown"; break; case 4: break; //trial user (OK for week 1) } break; case 1: $error = "You are not authorized to view this page (TRV 101). Error: Authorization Needed"; break; // case 2: $error = "You are not authorized to view this page (TRV 101). Error: Course Expired"; break; case 3: $error = "You are not authorized to view this page (TRV 101). Error: Administrative Hold"; break; case 4: $error = "You are not authorized to view this page (TRV 101). Error: Usage Exceeded"; break; } if ($error != "") {include("/usr/sites/www.trvuniversity.com/error.html"); exit(0);} ?> Technical Remote Viewing University: Remote Viewing Training Online
Quick Jump To Building:
Campus Overview Lecture Hall Administration
Laboratory Student Commons Auditorium
Library Bookstore Dormatories
Today is .
You are currently in: Library - Public
|  Enroll  |  Student Login  |  Training Forums  |  Live Chat  |  Student Account  |  Training Targets  |  News  |  Links  
TRV University Overview
Welcome to TRV University!

TRVU is the premiere training resource for remote viewing instruction.

TRV 101: Frequently Asked Questions - Cueing
TRV 101: Frequently Asked Questions - Cueing

   Q: When you cue a target, do you put the quote marks (".....") around the cue?

   A: In TRV, we employ quotes around a cue only in the case of a topical search, where the nature or existence of the target itself is problematic, such as "Atlantis," or in the case where the target is fixed, but is called by only a coined name, for example, "The Miami Circle" or "Lucy" (fossilized skeletal remains). In the latter case, it is always more prudent to employ a photo of the target as cueing material (Target Reference Material), than to risk sidetracking the Matrix with the coined name.

   Q: Has anyone figured out how to RV a sickly plant. Please help she is loosing her leaves. Thank you.

   
A: (plant name or label)/leaf loss problem/cause. This will require intermediate skills.

   Q: I am trying to find a new job. How would I go about Cueing this? name/ next job. name/next money source. Any ideas? Your help would be appreciated.

   
A: Try this: Grace/optimum trajectory/next job

   Q: If one was going to TRV the purpose of a group of individuals, but did not know the group name, could one assign a group name (would the matrix pick up on that title) or use the names as known? How would one write that cue? Just: given group name/purpose or individual name/individual name/individual name/purpose Thank you for your help and time.

   
A: "Purpose" would more than likely fail as a cue qualifier, despite your intent (the Matrix can only bend and adjust so much). 'Current collective plans' is better, for your 'purposes.'

   Example: Mr. A + Mr. B + Ms. C/current collective plans

   Q: My mountain bike disappeared from my porch a few weeks ago and I would like to use TRV to locate where it is and/or who is responsible for the loss. How would I go about cueing this project? Would my anger affect the data's accuracy?

   
A: See my past notes regarding the problem of a viewer attempting to work around an AI that has not dissipated -- a state that is, in effect, a PI (with regard to a specific issue/target set) that will preclude (occlude) effective TRV work. That said, you should start the project with the simple cue:

   Brennan's missing bike/present location and take it from there. I'll be here to advise you.

   Q: Hi, I've got a few wildlife pictures (tigers, birds, etc) and I want to do some training sessions using them as feedback. What would be the best way to cue them in this case?

   
A: You just did. Note, however, that if you did not have a target reference photo, and labeled the target folder "tiger," then you could end up describing any tiger, at any time -- Matrix choice. Animals and groups of animals -- prehistoric, as well -- are good training targets, primarily because they help the new TRV'er learn to discriminate between various types of life forms.

   Q: I think I remember you saying that one has to be very Careful when creating target cues, in the sense that one cannot assume the reality of something and then go from there. For e.g. Darth Vader/present location. What kinds of effects appear from this kind of error? What kind of information is going to be picked from the Matrix?

   
A: There are archived posts addressing this topic. Your own example, although it certainly can be subsumed under the rubric of a 'nonsensical cue,' is not an "error" by any means. Suppose that a future generation of TRV'ers dug up an English language newspaper with the very intriguing name "Darth Vader" mentioned in an article. Darth Vader could be assumed to have existed as a real person, whilst the name "Pee Wee Herman" might be assumed to be that of a cartoon character, but Pee Wee would produce a solid TRV target, with similar descriptors from session to session.

   Not so for Darth Vader as a cue -- an individual viewer would not be able to draw substantive conclusions from any number of sessions -- they would be 'all over the place,' as we say in the TRV profession -- other than that the target relates to abstract ideas connected with an extinct genre of entertainment, and some symbolic figure.

   The Matrix can be extremely versatile in assisting you in the task of data interpretation. Here is an excellent example:

   One of my former trainees was absolutely convinced that the "Reptillians" -- a supposed breed of predatory aliens, finding favor in contemporary popular UFO literature -- were real. Who am I to say any different? So, this 'topical search' was provided to her as a blind target. The results? Almost a total absence of S4 data, but a very interesting idea template (which had to be subject to further work, to elaborate). The idea template turned out to contain the following:

   1. Disney World, Florida, in the background.

   2. A swamp, in the foreground.

   3. An alligator floating in the swamp.

   It was an elegantly simply way of the Matrix getting the message across that the 'reptillians' were a 'fantasy.'

   Q: I suddenly had a thought. Is c/lee a comet, planet or a rock with a really high albedo? Can you give me a good cue to determine the gross characteristics of the object?

   
A: The failsafe, tried-and-proven, foolproof TRV method:

   Copy/download any astrophoto of the target object. Circle the selected point in the photocopy, and write the word "Target," along with an arrow pointing to the circle. Place the TRNs at the top of the photocopy. This sheet now becomes your Target Reference Material. Prepare a target folder. Write the word "Target" along with the TRNs on the folder. Place the sheet inside the folder. Unambiguous target = unequivocal data. As always, it is best to run the target blind.

   Q: Suppose a word or phrase is in code, could one circle the word or phrase, assign it a TRN and run a session to determine its meaning?

   
A: Yes. In a similar fashion, TRV is also a very powerful tool to decipher the (lost) meaning of any epigraph/ideograph/hieroglyph (e.g., Easter Island script). In fact, in the hands of a student or professor of ancient (or future) history, TRV could be employed to compile a virtual rosetta stone for any alien languages).

   Q: Hi, I was reading through the archives, and at one place you say that sometimes you have actually searched for "map features" when doing a geographical search. He then said it was too advanced at the time, and didn't give any more information. I would like to know what types of cues you use to do such a search.

   
A: Target name/location/nearest unique feature

   Q: Hello Everyone I found a website yesterday for the Boundray Institute that has PSI tests on it one of them is for remote viewing your target is a picture that you see after your done with the session. I am not sure how to cue it?

   
A: How to cue what? I saw that site and I have problems with it.

   No. 1 The RV test is not set up properly to stimulate psi perception in its natural functioning.

   No. 2 The cues are unnamed and randomly chosen without intent, therefore most are meaningless.

   No. 3 Meaningless photographs and inanimate objects are not impossible targets to remote view, however, they are represented as "minor spikes" or just "mere fluctuations" in the matrix (or the collective) which makes them "advanced targets" (not to mention boring). Only very skilled TRVer's who are willing to put in the time and effort will get those kinds of targets accurately.

   In my opinion, that test site was set up by undereducated opportunists who damage the Remote Viewing image by giving the public false impressions with their amateur displays.

   Q: When probing the mind of a deceased person what will happen if you don't specify a specific time frame during that persons life? 'When' in the target persons life will the information come from?

   
A: The most novel, unique, or eminently important.

   Q: i.e.: "from the mind of John Doe". Will this cue will the Matrix even regard time or will it deliver up a general overview of the target person?

   
A: It will deliver up a general over view after it grabs the significant markers in the persons life.

   Q: At the risk of sounding too esoteric... Will the matrix deliver up the most productive information with respect to the particular viewer?

   
A: Not to the Remote Viewer but to the particular cue.

   Q: When the cue is engineered to determine the winner of a sporting event but the event results in a tie, is the resultant data produced representative of both participants or is it purely nonsensical and ambiguous to the cue?

   
A: The resultant data -- especially S3 -- will incorporate elements of both.

   Q: I want to find out how Coral Castle was built. Would either of these cue work?

   Coral Castle/construction method(s)

   Coral Castle/origin

   
A: Begin with the more general term:

   'Coral Castle'/construction

   Also, if I were you, I would employ a photo as Target Reference Material, to be certain that unconscious does not slip onto something else (or more than one target) connected with that name/search term.

   Q: My wife's car was stolen last week. It's been like losing a family member for her. How would one cue a car's location, and would what comes back be useful to actually find it? If we can actually get it back from your information I'm sure we could work out a reward. Plus, it'd be great practice in applying TRV skills, no?

   
A: The proper cue for the first session would be:

   Wife's name + car/present location

   However, the real difficulty here is pinpointing the location in a homogenous terrain - and what if its moving.

   Perhaps you should first find out how it disappeared.

   Was it someone you know, a bunch of kids, your teenager, a tow truck, one person, etc.

   Wife's name + car/theft event/Wednesday (or whatever day it was)

   Q: I'll try to briefly explain the situation here, but I think it is going to be a long message no matter what I do. My neighbor is some sort of psychologist and had a client whom she thought was keying her car in the parking lot our fourplex shares. She went so far as to hire a private investigator to set up a video camera to catch this person. She got something on tape thinking it was this client messing with her car, and I offered to run the video through my digital editing system and try to get something usable out of it. The video camera she set up only takes a couple frames a second. But, upon watching the tape I realized what she gave me was taken the night that my wife's car was stolen (the tape is timecoded) and instead of her female client it is actually a male and he runs in, pulls on the handle of her car (not keying it) and runs off in the direction of the street in front where my wife's car was parked. Can this video be used to direct a remote viewing session to the person in the video and get any information about him? Is it possible to generate a name or anything really solid (I don't see how but I'm just starting mod. 1) from this? The video was too dark and the subject was moving too much to get any good facial features off it (I've tried every photoshop trick I know.. in spite of what we see in the movies if the data isn't there, it just isn't there.)

   
A: Freeze frame the image of the person in the video - print it out - circle the figure - label the target:

   Target Person/location/present time

   Do it as a blind target or give it to a skilled TRV'er who is willing to do a blind target for you.

   You cannot expect to get a name. (It's a rarity, requires advanced skills, and specialized training.)

   Q: Would this be a proper cue to find out any health problems you will have in the future if you continue your current lifestyle?

   myname/current trajectory/physical health

   
A: That is how I would cue it.

   Q: I have been doing two or three targets a day for about 1 week. Sometimes results are stunning, other times far off.

   My last target was titled 'John Doe family farm, xxxx, Montana'. (of course, the real target had all the specifics filled in). My ideogram was the symbol for spirit leaving (or possibly arriving). One person in the family has cancer. Does this qualify as a hit?

   
A: No. A "hit" would include the summary description of 'a Life form at the site, probably human, who is seriously ill, possibly dying." This, notwithstanding, the cue subsumed two separate targets (primary idea patterns): "John Doe family" and "John Doe farm" (By the way, are animals slaughtered on this farm?) Tighten up on those cues.

   Q: I have a quick question. Is it possible to use a physical object as the cue for remote viewing. For example, can I take a physical object such as a murder weapon, set it on the table with a target # tag, and use that as a cue for the RV ideogram source in stage one? It would have to be setup kind of oddly so as to perceive the event attached to that item as opposed to the item itself, but I was just wondering if this were possible. If not would it be better to photograph the object, cue it as normal, and then just go from there?

   
A: Do it by the book, or you are asking for trouble (trouble = ambiguity)

   Q: I would like to do a session to find out if there really is a "Loch Ness Monster". If I use "Loch Ness Monster" as a search term, I am afraid I will get images of what people think it looks like. I want to find out what it REALLY looks like, if it exists at all. How should I qualify the search term? Loch Ness Monster/current physical structure?

   
A: Begin with a topical search (see archives for instructions; requires 6 TRV probes, and then refined cueing).

   Q: I have printed out instructions from archives on setting up a topical search. I take it that I run it blind, throw it back into the "blind" pile (perhaps with a different set of TRN's) and run it again until a total of 6 runs have been completed.

   I also gathered from the archives that the six sessions are then "compiled" into a more comprehensive picture. Would the "more refined cueing" then be targeting objects within this resulting composite?

   
A: No. You must first draw an analytical conclusion about the search, (i.e., what does it appear that you are actually dealing with?), based upon all of your session summaries.

   Q: Would you have time to review 5 "Q's" for events I have outlined in the book "The 12th Planet"? I want to be sure I have fit it in the right structure.

   
A: "Cues" Of course. That is what this place is for.

   Q: Here are the cues:

   The Mutiny of the Anunnaki

   The Nefilim

   Shepherd of the Black Headed Ones

   The Chamber of Fates

   The sons of God who married the daughters of men

   
A: These all constitute TRV topical searches, i.e., it is problematic whether or not each topic (cue) is veridical. So, a series of TRV probes must be run on each. Don't forget to employ italics (quotation marks OK) when you write the cue.

   Q: I have been remote viewing future boxing matches the last two weeks with stunning results. I have successfully predicted the winners based upon their trunk colors and the AI's and EI's associated with each boxer. I have also picked up skin colors but this is only useful if they are different. My problem is that until they appear at ringside and I can see their trunk colors, I don't know who the winning fighter will be. My question is, Is there a way to refine the cue in another session so that I can tell where each fighter is from? This is complicated by the fact that a man can be born in LA but train out of NY.

   
A: Three cue qualifiers could be of help (we sometimes employ these when tracking down criminals):

   a) home (gives description of general area)

   b) current residence (careful here -- target may be on the move, or have more than one residence)

   c) birthplace

   There are a number of others.

   Q: Forgive me if this is posted in the wrong location but I have a question I really would like answered.

   I have no problem labeling inanimate objects or causes of events as targets. I would like to know how a target such as "inside a war-room." would be targeted in order to be able to see the entire room, the people in the room, the project they are working on and the mood amongst the people in the room. (Name of location) War Room/activity/date (or next project or current project)

   Would each piece of information that is being sought have to have it's own TRV session?

   
A: No, after your Idea template, perform movements focusing on the aspects which interest you.

   If so, how would one label the target to where each time you TRV one piece of information it is at the same time as the others that have been remote-viewed?

   You can also do it this way using the data from your first session. Be careful not to interject assumptions or premature analysis into your refined cue

   Q: On the radio recently you talked about an experience you had while targeting guidance from Jesus. How did you cue it? your name/the mind of Jesus Christ/guidance? Would you recommend that someone not yet advanced in TRV not cue this for themselves?

   
A: [name/Jesus Christ/guidance]

   Q: I don't know if this is the right place to post this, but I was wondering....there is so much talk about how we have "lost touch" with our spiritual side, and indeed, I feel that on a daily basis. Assuming mind and soul are two different aspects of our being, but interconnected, would it be possible to remote view our soul to get in touch with our spiritual side? If so, how would one cue it? Is this a dumb question? -Kimberly

   
A: [Kimberly's soul]

   Q: Was wondering if it is possible to view the meaning of a certain dream, and how would that be cued?

   running in the streets dream/meaning

   Would a sketch make it easier to view? And also, could I remote view someone else's dream if they are the one assigning the target?

   
A: Your cue, as stated, is acceptable. Recognize, however, that multiple/complex meanings could be present in the dream (cf. a run-on sentence). Also, like a snowball that picks up debris and trash as it rolls downhill, dreams tend to behave similarly (and many dreams have no 'meaning' -- just the unconscious performing 'housecleaning' at the end of the day.

   This is the cue that I have found to be effective:

   Mr. X/running through the park dream/seed

   That is, what was the (target) element that 'seeded' (spawned) the dream?

   Q: In recovering from a pretty drawn out illness, I've been pulling a few TRN's from the target of the week archives to practice with. My question has to do with the TRN's. I understand that the TRN's are for administrative purposes, however, when I cue a target such as [6736/0732] Next passenger airline disaster, blindly, does the matrix prompt my subconscious to go after what was cued at that time or does the qualifier of 'next' prompt me to target another disaster from this time forward?

   
A: 'Next' as of the start time of your present session. (Good question)

   Q: How would one go about cuing for pregnancy? Name/womb/present contents ?

   
A: Another very good question. Your cue would work quite well, IF this were run as a blind target; don't attempt to work a target of this sensitivity, front-loaded. However, first change the cue qualifier from "present contents" to 'present time' -- a womb contains a lot of stuff, with or without child.

   Remember, the 'answer to the problem' is contained in the first S3 sketch. Since S4 data would not be of much help in solving this particular problem, simply turn the entire session into a target geometry. In this way, if a fetus is present (or multiple fetuses), many times you will be able to determine sex; the Matrix goes beyond the call of duty, to the next question -- inducing the (blind) viewer to depict the presence or absence of a little projection (penis) protruding from the target(s).

   Q: While I have been monitoring the target of the week dialogue over the last few months; I have finally resolve some of my conflicts, bought a scanner and recruited a partner (who plans to buy her own set of tapes).

   Reviewing the TRN for the TOTW and trying not to contaminate my memory, I came upon the idea to assign a new random TRN to the ones assigned to your TRN's.

   Will the matrix know my intent and process the original target or does your TRN become the target numbers, thus the target?

   I would like to do all the TOTW over the new couple weeks as blindly as possible.

   It occurs to me that the cue may need to be: PSI TECH/(totw#3-[0000/0000])

   
A: A number of cues would be acceptable, but cue formulation must be done with care, so that the original/tasker-intended target pattern ensemble is not altered in any way (else, you will end up either redirecting your unconscious attention to another matrix pattern, and/or pull in additional undesired -- possibly acontextual -- elements that will greatly obfuscate the session, and add to the complexity of analysis.

   Q: Can one employ any search terms to learn more about psychokinesis. Mabye psychokinesis/cause?

   
A: Yes. But employing the cue in this manner would constitute a TRV topical search. In investigations of this nature, I personally prefer to maintain 'chain of custody' -- selecting a specific/discrete instance of the generically termed phenomenon (i.e., an instance where most reasonable people would agree that PK/telekinesis was effected/observed), and then go from there. For instance:

   Tom's house/yesterday/picture dropping off of wall/cause or similar cues. Don't assume anything.

   Q: How would I cue a target to find someone's name? Is that possible? In what stage would I do this?

   
A: Review videos re: TRV limitations (ref. alphanumerics).

   Q: During one practicing session today I found myself unable to continue after "From The Top of Target[X]and S4 were done. From the top of aspect[A]on either I got identical ideograms one after the other or I got frustrated. Is this the matrix telling me that I have a nonsense cue? Or is it that the answer was in the first S3 and S3A[X] sketches of my session already?

   
A: There is not a general answer true in all circumstances to this question.

   Q: The cue was: "debate/person's name/final/residence/result"

   
A: However, in this case it was a nonsense cue. (Thank your practical unconscious mind for not taking you on Mr. Toad's wild goose nonsense ride)

   Q: Can you remote view what somebody thinks??? If so how would you cue that. I see this may be challenging to do but doesn't the matrix record everything? No secrets right...

   
A: Right..

   (Your Name) /conscious thoughts/present time

   You will download primarily the ideation (the driver) behind the thoughts and possibly a few of the actual thoughts.

   Whoa! S c A t T e R B r A i N !!!

   Q: We have a case here involving a friend of mine that is being stalked by a 10-96. Conventional investigation methods have not identified the person yet. What would be some good targeting queues to find out who/where this person is? We do have a letter that she found under her door, how could I use this in the targeting envelope?

   
A: I would use this one first and remember, do not 'assume anything' when cueing up a target. "Author of Letter/Current Location."

   Q: I want to TRV a person who disappeared. I know it's no good trying to TRV something that is emotionally close to you. This person I believe was done in. So I'm not even going to attempt to frontload it. What I want to try, is to put the cue in with my stack of blind target folders, so, that one day I will randomly pull it and do the session blind. My question is, if I cue it like this:

   person's name/present location

   would this be the best way to cue it if I want to find out if the person is alive or dead?

   
A: Yes, that is exactly the cue to start out with.

   If the person is dead, would the matrix give me info on the person's soul? Or the person's dead body?

   Actually both. By the end of your first S2 you should have the raw data that you are dealing with a dead body. In S4 the data will take on a more esoteric tone. I would not jump to conclusions that this is the soul though.

   Q: I need some help with cueing… I'm trying to create a time registry to more accurately nail down the target in time. Here is what I have setup. A binder with 4 pocket folders in it. The folders are colored blue, green, yellow, and red. Blue pocket folder would = the year Green would = the month. And red the day. I plan on putting unique pre-determined targets in each pocket folder according to the date. Anyway, my questions is how to cue everything. First I wanted to Ascertain if the matrix distinguished the target via folder color. I tried these cues. Target in blue pocket folder The data I got back seemed as though I was viewing the target itself (envelope with a picture), not the location. Then I tried "target in blue pocket folder/source" Data was nonsensical. Next I tried "Target in blue pocket folder/origin" Date was still nonsensical. Then I tried another approach, viewing photo origins rather then targets. I tried these cues: "Photo in blue pocket folder/source," "Photo in blue pocket folder/origin," "Black binder/blue pocket folder/photo/source." All of which produced nonsensical data that closely matched each session. Where I'm I going wrong? Will the matrix recognize a target in a specific location like inside a blue pocket folder? Is the cueing right? Are the different targets/photos in the separate folders getting morphed together? Is that why the data is nonsensical? Any ideas?

   
A: The experimenting that you describe has become known as ARV which is currently practiced by RVers who want "yes" and "No" answers. There are several intrinsic problems that I see with this procedure. The first problem is that it does not appear to be recognized as a static system in the collective (matrix). People are still experimenting with it and there is no repetition of protocols that consistently and successfully delivers up the data. Second problem is that the colors and photos that are being used basically have little to no meaning in the collective and your intent is to use them only as markers for the real target. Therefore, your intent is indirect but the system itself is set up to provide direct knowledge. Additionally, TRVing insignificant events such as colors, folders, photos requires advanced skills because not only are they horrifically boring to our unconscious but they are also very small spikes in the collective so, you are essentially attempting to find bones in an enormous cluttered space with a bored puppy dog who knows he will receive no reward. If you are really only trying to refine your time lines, you are better off using traditional TRV and real world events like birthdays, holidays etc. I have had a great deal of success myself by TRVing my 'optimum trajectory/next 7 days' and 'next 3 days' or 'next 30 days' All of which provide me with fairly quick (and useful) feedback while refining my 'time determining perceptual antennae'.

   Q: Is this a specific enough TRV cue for predicting the outcome of dog races in my town?

   Sarasota Kennel Club/next race/winning dog

   If this cue is satisfactory, would I need to change my TRN's five times when working sessions for five consecutive races, or should I just work five sessions and keep the same TRN?

   
A: The cue is correct, and may be employed prior to each race (same TRN).

   Q: I'm a bit confused. Wouldn't keeping the same TRN for each dog race task "morph" my results? For reference and filing purposes, shouldn't I change my TRN each time I work a dog race task?

   
A: No. It is just another iteration of the same task/cue.

   There is a big difference, as far as the Matrix is concerned, between the winner of the 'last' race, and the winner of the 'next' race.

   If you recall, I mentioned that there is yet another way to run this problem -- here it is (this will work well for any contest where the participants are similarly matched and typed, AND THE 'FUTURE' RESULTS ARE SET IN THE MATRIX, which is very often the case):

   1. On a separate index card, write down the names of each participant, the contest name, and the following cue qualifier:

   Bonnie Lass/next Derby Downs race/results

   2. Also, write a unique TRN on each card (if you do this yourself, choose TRN's that are so similar to each other that you will not be able to consciously remember which TRN goes with which contestant name. (But don't use the same one twice!)

   3. Next, write each of the TRN's on an individual envelope, fold its matched index card in half (so that the writing is not visible from the outside of the envelope), and place it within.

   4. Shuffle the envelopes. Choose one, and place it in front of you, keeping the the others at a distance.

   5. Work the TRN as you would for any other Module 2 session, BUT END THE SESSION UPON COMPLETION OF THE FIRST STAGE 3.

   6. Remove the short session and targeting envelope from your proximity. Wait at least 5 minutes, before beginning the next session.

   7. Continue in this manner, until all of the targets have been worked.

   8. Now, lay out the results of all your session work, side by side. Look for the most unique S3; which participant stands out the most, at the end of a race? (The leader of the pack, of course).

   Practice this for several races, until you get it down. (There are a couple of folks on this board who have mastered this technique, and they are really quiet about their success rates). It is fun, also, to do this in consort with other skilled TRV'ers, i.e., compare results.

   Q: Is the cue, "radio station's name/financial gain/optimum trajectory" the most effective cue to utilize in ascertaining the radio station's method(s) to employ in acquiring the funds needed to maintain operations? Any advice here would certainly be appreciated.

   
A: Not really. It is not a good cue, for a couple of reasons:

   First of all, KPIG is both an enterprise, consisting of a number of people, interacting in complex ways, as well as an ensemble of physical structures. That complicates cueing to no small degree. The structures do not have a 'financial' trajectory, the enterprise does.

   The Matrix may not necessarily apply the same 'logic' that you would to this cue. For instance, if (unbeknownst to you) a deadly tornado is in the cards for tomorrow afternoon, and KPIG (the station) happens to be ground zero, then (without a skilled TRV eye) you might not be able to make sense out of the resulting Idea Template which may depict an empty or flattened structure, with its usual occupants/owner, huddled together in Farmer John's root cellar, miles away. (Can't make any hay if you're dead).

   ...the 'radio station' can't 'make money' -- the enterprise can. However, I have not experienced any degree of success in the employment of TRV in this class of problem. (This is not the case with engineering or manufacturing trajectories, where the goal is dictated by a specific set of conditions, collectively agreed upon in advance by the corporate 'enterprise').

   You need to narrow the range of performance objectives and come up with some tight parameters. What are KPIG's existing and possible sources of capital? If, say, advertising is a key source, then use TRV to assist here. That is certainly how I would approach the problem. We can use the Matrix as a crystal ball to only some degree -- it can't do all of our thinking for us.

   After you digest the above, I will indeed assist you with cueing.

   Q: I recently worked a target that was simply: friends name/current location

   I was wondering if a sketch could be done of the persons face or enough info to be able to tell which friend it is.

   
A: If that is the verbatim cue, then you are out of luck. Unlike many rich abstract ideas, a person's "name" doesn't have much of a "location" in the Matrix. A thing's name is primarily a Matrix address 'pointer' to its pattern existence.

   The cue: friend/current location

   would not be productive, either, because there are a whole lot of mutual "friends" in the Universes.

   Joe's friend/current location

   might give you something, unless the Matrix determined that you have no friends, in which case you might end up describing only Jesus, the neighbor's dog -- or yourself.

   Drawings, renderings, and models are part of Stage 6. Concentrate on learning TRV cueing, first.

   Q: Ok, get ready to roll your eyes at this one: My question: If, as you say, the info received from the matrix from a remote viewing session is used to alter the outcome of the event TRV'ed, then the TRV'er would not be able to originally determine the outcome in the Initial TRV session, then....how can you go to your death and look back to see what you could have been, if you are then using that information to change your current paths to alter the outcome of your lifeto fit the mold of what you could have been?

   
A: We can TRV our "trajectories" (life's paths) and determine whether we are on our "optimal trajectory" or not. However, ones' optimal trajectory may not be the easiest (actually, it usually isn't) So, one may elect to make different choices to change direction, and purposely not be on that particular path.

   Q: P.S., would this cue work: Kimberly/optimum potential ? Or is that totally stupid?

   
A: You need to qualify it.

   Kimberly/optimum potential/physical health

   Kimberly/optimum potential/mental health

   Kimberly/optimum potential/remote viewing

   Kimberly/optimum potential/stupid questions

   (get the picture?)

   Q: Then have a movement where I write, from the moment of Kimberly's death looking back, something should be perceivable?

   
A: Kimberly/current trajectory/death event

   Then, you could use some of the same movements performed in the (2nd rendition) President Clinton target of the week.

   Q: When you are doing an RV session and the cue involves yourself do you instinctively or intuitively sense that you are viewing yourself.

   
A: Not usually

   Q: What cues would you use to find a when a specific event will occur? (E.g. When a stock price will hit a certain value, or when a certain level of performance\technology will be achieved)?

   I am not afraid to experiment but why reinvent the wheel when the designer of the wheel, is putting air into everyone's tires?

   
A: The "specific event" may be a false premise, or even nonsensical (as far as the Matrix is concerned) or 'fuzzy.' (For instance, "stock," "price," and "value" are abstract concepts).

   Q: I am having a small problem. I know that you said the random target numbers is nothing but for record purposes, But I quickly memorize (not on purpose, but it just happens) them on the envelops, thus causing me to associate the image with a certain number. So, to my question is it ok for me to use the same number on all the envelopes to help stop this?

   
A: Don't do it; as long as only one target envelope is on the table, it will work -- but will lead to complications, later. Just have a second party assign the random numbers.

   Q: I have successfully worked on ideograms that identify "places". I am now working on events, My ideograms tend to be horizontal across "land" ideograms. The target is: (corn future contract/next major upward move in the commodity market). A land ideogram seems like the correct S1 but I'm not sure. Please respond.

   
A: This is a nonsense cue, as far as the Matrix is concerned.

   Q: Can a person use geographic coordinates as TRN's?

   
A: Cartesian coordinates work perfectly (for geographic locations). Remember, TRV's roots were CRV (Coordinate Remote Viewing). The original experimental program was termed Project SCANATE, an acronym coined by Ingo Swann (for "SCANning by coordinATE").

   Q: Hi, I was reading through the archives, and at one place you said that sometimes you have actually searched for "map features" when doing a geographical search. He then said it was too advanced at the time, and didn't give any more information. I would like to know what types of cues you use to do such a search.

   
A: Target name/location/nearest unique feature

   Q: How would I go about finding out if someone is using drugs or not. And if so what kind. (To exclude aspirin, cough syrup, etc.) I assume this would be a multiple session, but I'm not sure how to cue it all.

   Name/drug use/present

   or

   Name/next drug used

   Then a follow up description of Aspect A or whatever the main focus is?

   I don't know how to be specific in relation to the here and now as opposed to the past or generalities of types. Would intention be enough to focus the search down?

   Was working through the logistics of this and I suppose that the collective unconscious, or the matrix, would probably either give me erroneous data, or some other meaning or context describing through S4 data, that the session is in conflict with an individuals personal liberties. An invasion of privacy. So even if my intentions were good, to help someone out, a TRV session would encompass more information than I, as an individual, should be privy to as it relates to another persons "life course", in this context. Anyway, solutions always present themselves.

   
A: If the collective was "conscious" there may, perhaps, be secrets but since it is collective and primarily an "unconscious" data force - I do not believe that it understands or practices "secrets" or the idea of "personal liberties" and "privacy." I believe that these are (human) personal choices and opinions.

   Q: So even if my intentions were good, to help someone out, a TRV session would encompass more information than I, as an individual, should be privy to as it relates to another persons "life course".

   
A: Good intentions are essential and respect is honorable but if the individual is your child, I think that the parent would not only feel privy to this type of information but wholly entitled to it (especially in today's world). The matrix does not decide for us who is privy and who isn't.

   Q: In this context. Anyway, solutions always present themselves.

   
A: I can tell you from personal experience that the cue works and if the TRV'ers skills are advanced enough, the cue: "Persons name / current mind state" should reveal a clue to the answer. Do that, see what pops up, and then, if needed we can discuss "optimal movements" for solving this problem.

   Q: Can a cue like NY Mets/next game/winning team/after 5 innings work? Or does the Matrix not understand after. Any help with this kind of cue would be helpful. I guess you could say I'm interested in the winning team after the 5th inning.

   
A: It need not be that complicated.

   Cue it like this:

   Name of Game/Place and Day /Winning Team

   When you have completed the session/s, look for identifiers, such as colors and symbols (emblems)



Click here to return to the library.


All contents ©PSI TECH, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Contact webmaster@trvuniversity.com with questions or comments.